Adverse Global Experiences (AGEs) and the Amygdala: Implications for Doctoring and Health
In what paradigm do we operate as physicians? How does this affect our care of patients?
In December 1999, Donella Meadows published an article in Sustainability Institute titled “Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System.”1 She starts at the bottom with number 12 (constants, parameters, numbers) and goes through number five (the structure of information flows) up to number two (the mindset or paradigm out of which the system—its goals, structure, rules, delays, parameters—arises). Number one is the power to transcend paradigms.
Just a year earlier, Drs. Robert Anda and Vincent Felliti published “Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults” in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2 The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) study offers a paradigm shift. Anda and Felliti repeatedly encountered what physicians still see in practice today. From obesity to tobacco abuse, chronic disease in adulthood so often has a backstory of adversity in childhood. The old paradigm was “What’s wrong with you?” ACEs invite us to ask, “What happened to you, what are your strengths and needs?”
Adversity and resilience research has blossomed in the two decades since. We understand many of the neural pathways by which toxic stress in childhood translates into lifelong disease.3, 4 Our mammalian brains evolved to cope with short periods of danger against a backdrop of relative stability and safety. When a threat is ongoing, high levels of stress hormones literally kill brain cells. This begs the question: do we need a new paradigm? Dr. Anda would be the first to acknowledge that beyond the 10 originally described ACEs, children face poverty, racism, sexism, bullying, etc. Are there toxic stresses beyond childhood, dangers affecting every aspect…